The politics of disruption: Quorum breaks, gerrymandering and democratic participation in Texas

By Anyla McDonald The Black Lens

In the intricate dance of American democracy, procedural tactics can often take center stage, influencing the outcome of legislative battles and shaping the political landscape. Two such tactics, the breaking of quorum and gerrymandering, have been prominently employed in Texas, highlighting the deep partisan divisions and the ongoing struggle for political power.

In recent years, Texas Democrats have twice employed the strategy of breaking quorum to obstruct legislation they deemed harmful. In 2021, Democratic members of the Texas House of Representatives fled the state to prevent a vote on a controversial voting bill that they argued would disproportionately disenfranchise minority voters. By denying the House the necessary number of members present to conduct business, they effectively stalled the bill’s progress. While this tactic garnered national attention and temporarily blocked the legislation, it also drew criticism from Republicans who accused the Democrats of shirking their responsibilities and undermining the democratic process.

Conversely, Texas Republicans have been accused of manipulating district boundaries through gerrymandering to consolidate their political power. Following the 2020 census, the Republican-controlled Texas legislature redrew congressional and state legislative districts. Critics contend that the new maps were designed to pack Democratic voters into fewer districts, thereby diminishing their overall influence and ensuring Republican dominance in other areas. This practice, known as gerrymandering, has been challenged in court, with plaintiffs arguing that the maps violate the Voting Rights Act by diluting the voting power of minority communities.

Both quorum breaks and gerrymandering raise fundamental questions about the fairness and legitimacy of the democratic process. While breaking quorum can be seen as a desperate measure to protect minority rights and prevent the passage of harmful legislation, it also risks alienating moderate voters and undermining the principle of majority rule. Similarly, while gerrymandering may be a legal tactic, it can distort the will of the voters and create an uneven playing field, making it more difficult for opposing parties to compete effectively.

The use of these tactics in Texas underscores the intense partisan polarization that characterizes contemporary American politics. As the state’s demographics continue to shift and its population becomes more diverse, the battle for political power is likely to intensify. Finding ways to bridge the partisan divide, promote fair and transparent elections, and ensure that all voices are heard will be crucial to preserving the health of democracy in Texas and beyond.